Skip to content

2 Million TPS and Decentralized? Has the Zero Blockchain Cracked Scalability?

LayerZero Labs CEO Brian Pellegrino unveils Zero, a new Layer 1 blockchain targeting 2 million TPS. By utilizing novel ZK compression, Zero aims to solve the scalability trilemma, offering global market capacity while maintaining Ethereum-level decentralization.

Table of Contents

The blockchain industry has long wrestled with the "scalability trilemma"—the notion that a network can only achieve two of three core properties: decentralization, security, and scalability. In a recent discussion with Laura Shin on Unchained, Brian Pellegrino, CEO of LayerZero Labs, announced a new contender aiming to solve this stalemate: the Zero blockchain. Moving beyond LayerZero’s roots as an interoperability protocol, Zero is a fully independent Layer 1 blockchain designed to process millions of transactions per second (TPS) while maintaining the decentralized ethos of Ethereum.

Pellegrino’s announcement outlines a radical architectural shift, moving away from the standard replication models used by current blockchains. Backed by major traditional finance (TradFi) players and leveraging novel zero-knowledge (ZK) compression techniques, Zero aims to support global markets and payments at a scale previously reserved for centralized servers.

Key Takeaways

  • Massive Scalability: Zero claims the ability to process over 2 million transactions per second per zone, utilizing consumer-grade hardware for verification.
  • Four Core Breakthroughs: The architecture relies on innovations in storage (QMDB), execution (FAFO), network compression (SVID), and zero-knowledge proofs.
  • Institutional Heavyweights: Launch partners include Citadel Securities, the DTCC, and Intercontinental Exchange (parent company of the NYSE).
  • Heterogeneous Architecture: The network separates heavy computation (provers) from verification (nodes), allowing "super nodes" to build blocks while small nodes (e.g., Raspberry Pis) verify them trustlessly.
  • No New Token: Zero will utilize the existing ZRO token for gas and staking, eschewing the trend of launching new tokens for fresh chains.

Solving the Replication Crisis

The impetus for building Zero stemmed from a disillusionment with the current trajectory of blockchain scaling. Pellegrino argues that the industry has bifurcated into two flawed approaches: centralized high-performance chains (like Solana) that require expensive hardware, and decentralized but slow chains (like Ethereum) that rely on Layer 2s, which often introduce their own centralization risks.

The core inefficiency, according to Pellegrino, is the "cost of replication." In traditional blockchains, if a network has one million nodes, every single node must re-execute the exact same computation for every transaction. This redundancy creates a massive ceiling on performance.

The core problem with any blockchain today is that if you have a million nodes, every single one of those million nodes is reproducing the same exact compute. So you're paying effectively a million times the cost of doing the computation itself.

Zero’s architecture attempts to invert this model. Instead of every node executing every transaction, the network uses a heterogeneous structure. Large, powerful sequencers (which can be rotated and run by anyone) handle the heavy lifting of computation and proof generation. The rest of the network—comprising potentially millions of small, decentralized nodes—simply verifies the Zero Knowledge proof. This allows the network to achieve the speed of centralized servers with the security guarantees of a decentralized validator set.

The Four Technical Breakthroughs

To achieve the claimed throughput of millions of TPS, LayerZero Labs had to re-engineer the blockchain stack from the bottom up. Pellegrino detailed four specific "100x breakthroughs" that make Zero possible.

1. QMDB (Storage Layer)

Early in development, the team realized that the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM) wasn't inherently slow; it was bottlenecked by data retrieval. They developed QMDB, a log-based database structure designed to replace the standard Merkle Patricia Trie (MPT). This change reportedly allows for over 3 million updates per second, removing the I/O bottleneck that constrains most chains.

2. FAFO (Execution Layer)

With the storage bottleneck removed, the team focused on execution. FAFO is an execution environment that allows a single node, running the standard EVM with all its overhead, to process 1 million transactions per second. This challenges the long-held assumption that the EVM is too cumbersome for high-frequency systems.

3. SVID (Network Layer)

To handle the data bandwidth required for millions of TPS, Zero utilizes SVID, a method for compressing data transmission across the network. This ensures that even with massive throughput, the bandwidth requirements do not exclude home stakers or smaller node operators.

4. ZK as Compression (Consensus Layer)

The final key is the use of Zero Knowledge proofs, specifically leveraging a technology called Jolt. In the context of Zero, ZK is used primarily for compression of compute rather than just privacy. By generating a proof of correct execution, the network allows nodes to verify the state without re-running the transactions.

You’re going to run that computation once, generate a proof, and then all the nodes in the network only need to validate the proof... verifying the proof is effectively free relative to doing the computation itself.

A Platform for Global Markets and Payments

Zero is structured similarly to Ethereum’s Beacon Chain but with distinct "zones" running on top. It is execution-agnostic, meaning it can support zones running the EVM, Solana’s SVM, Move VM, or even standard Linux binaries.

At launch, Zero will feature three primary zones tailored to specific market needs:

  1. General Purpose Smart Contracts: A standard zone for decentralized application (dApp) development, similar to existing Layer 1s.
  2. Global Markets: Designed in partnership with major financial institutions, this zone aims to facilitate 24/7 trading across all asset classes (forex, commodities, equities, and crypto).
  3. Payments: A zone focused on high-throughput, low-cost value transfer.

Institutional Partnerships

The project has garnered support from some of the largest entities in traditional finance. Partners include Citadel Securities (a massive market maker), the DTCC (which processes quadrillions of dollars in securities), and ICE (parent of the NYSE). Additionally, Tether has invested in LayerZero Labs, signaling a strong focus on stablecoin integration within the Payments zone.

Pellegrino emphasized that these are not just marketing logos; these institutions are looking for infrastructure capable of handling global order books—something current blockchains simply cannot support at scale.

Tokenomics and Launch Strategy

In a deviation from standard industry practice, LayerZero Labs is not launching a new token for this blockchain. The existing ZRO token will serve as the native asset for gas fees and staking within the Proof-of-Stake consensus mechanism. This decision aligns with Pellegrino’s critique of the "airdrop farming" culture, which he believes creates artificial, fleeting communities.

The mainnet is currently targeted for launch in September. Rather than chasing Total Value Locked (TVL) through inflationary incentives, the team is focusing on onboarding partners who bring inherent volume and utility, such as stablecoin issuers and market makers.

Conclusion

Zero represents a bold bet on the future of blockchain infrastructure. By combining the speed of centralized systems with the trustlessness of ZK-verified decentralized networks, it aims to capture the "last mile" of institutional adoption that has eluded the crypto industry thus far. If the technical claims of verifying millions of transactions per second on consumer hardware hold true, Zero could fundamentally alter the landscape of high-performance blockchains.

Latest

The Tech Tournmanent Final Four! - DTNS Office Hours

The Tech Tournmanent Final Four! - DTNS Office Hours

Tom Merritt reveals the 'Final Four' for the Tech Tournament of Best Tech Stores on DTNS Office Hours. With upsets like Radio Shack beating Fry’s and Micro Center topping the Apple Store, the semifinals are set. Vote now to decide which retail giant or fan favorite makes the final!

Members Public
AI Adoption Will Be Rewarded: 7IM’s Kelemen

AI Adoption Will Be Rewarded: 7IM’s Kelemen

7IM CIO Shanti Kelemen suggests that while NVIDIA remains a bellwether, the future of AI growth depends on adoption in non-tech sectors. Investors are now moving beyond Big Tech to find tangible implementation and earnings growth in traditional industries like banking and retail.

Members Public
Does the Head of Xbox Need to Be a Gamer? - DTNS 5211

Does the Head of Xbox Need to Be a Gamer? - DTNS 5211

Microsoft Gaming undergoes a massive leadership shakeup as Phil Spencer exits and Asha Sharma is named the new CEO. As the company pivots toward AI and profitability, we ask: does the head of Xbox need to be a gamer? Explore the future of hardware and strategy in DTNS 5211.

Members Public