Table of Contents
How Bending Spoons built a $700M revenue company in Italy with no VC funding, 1% turnover, and controversial acquisition strategy that completely rewrote Evernote's architecture.
Key Takeaways
- Bending Spoons operates 100+ digital products generating $700M revenue with just 450 employees, maintaining profitability every year since founding in 2013
- Their controversial acquisition strategy involves immediate organizational restructuring and layoffs, but creates long-term sustainable businesses from struggling companies
- "Radical simplicity" drives all decisions—complexity requires proof of benefit while simplicity needs no justification, eliminating bonuses, titles, and traditional career ladders
- Engineering culture avoids on-call systems entirely, forcing developers to build robust systems from the start rather than relying on operational safety nets
- Complete Evernote backend rewrite moved from 750 manually-provisioned VMs with Java monolith to microservices with event-driven architecture and 10-12x performance improvements
- Hiring focuses on junior engineers and new graduates for talent over experience, creating 1% annual unwanted turnover rate through cultural alignment
- Platform-first architecture enables shared services across all products including authentication, monetization, analytics, and machine learning capabilities
- Self-funded growth through bank loans rather than venture capital created sustainable business practices and operational efficiency focus
Timeline Overview
- 2010-2013: Foundation Years — Failed AI diary startup Evertale in Copenhagen provided $40k seed money and founding team for Bending Spoons
- 2013-2014: Early Acquisitions — Moved to Milan, started with $10k keyboard personalization app acquisition, learning acquisition and improvement process
- 2014-2019: Platform Building — Developed shared technology platform while acquiring dozens of mobile apps and building operational expertise
- 2020-2022: Major Acquisitions — Acquired Splice from GoPro, then Evernote, Meetup, Mosaic, RapidWeaver, StreamYard representing shift to larger deals
- 2023: Evernote Transformation — Complete backend rewrite from Java monolith to microservices, 100+ feature releases, performance improvements
- 2024: Scaling Success — Over $700M revenue, 200M+ monthly active users, 100+ products, continued acquisition strategy with WeTransfer
- Current Platform — 100k+ requests per second, 4000 GPU allocation for AI workloads, comprehensive shared services supporting all business units
- Future Vision — Continued focus on acquisition-driven growth, platform expansion, and maintaining profitable operations without external funding
</details>
The Controversial Acquisition Philosophy: Transforming Struggling Companies
- Bending Spoons' acquisition strategy targets companies actively seeking buyers due to struggling performance or strategic misalignment rather than successful businesses
- The approach involves immediate "learning phase" lasting weeks or months where experienced team members embed across all levels to understand operations deeply
- Post-acquisition restructuring typically reduces organizational size while increasing individual autonomy and project ownership, eliminating unfocused initiatives
- Leadership acknowledges layoffs "suck" but views them as necessary for creating sustainable long-term businesses that can thrive for decades rather than slowly declining
The acquisition philosophy reflects fundamental disagreement with Silicon Valley orthodoxy about business optimization versus workforce preservation. CEO Luca Ferrari frames this as ideological divide between different worldviews.
The "two camps" framework distinguishes between those who believe surviving businesses shouldn't be optimized if it requires difficult decisions, versus those who advocate building the most effective organizations possible while treating affected employees supportively.
- Companies like Evernote were already struggling financially before acquisition, making transformation necessary for survival rather than optional optimization
- The alternative to difficult transitions often involves complete business failure and job loss for entire organizations rather than selective restructuring
- Transparent communication about controversial principles occurs during hiring process through "controversial principles" document shared with all job candidates
- Results demonstrate effectiveness with extremely low 1% annual unwanted turnover rate and high employee satisfaction scores on review platforms
The approach requires long-term thinking and patient capital rather than short-term optimization, justifying difficult decisions through sustainable business creation.
Radical Simplicity: The Core Operating Principle
- "Radical simplicity" drives all company decisions with cultural mandate to seek the most simple solution for every challenge across technology, processes, and policies
- Complexity addition requires burden of proof from advocates while simplicity retention needs no justification, reversing typical organizational dynamics
- Compensation structure exemplifies principle through elimination of bonuses, variable pay, and complex incentive systems in favor of fixed salaries plus optional equity
- The approach extends beyond technology to organizational design, eliminating traditional career ladders, titles, and performance management complexity
The simplicity framework challenges conventional wisdom about motivation and organizational design while demonstrating practical benefits through reduced administrative overhead and clearer decision-making.
Process simplification removes traditional startup complexity around bonus calculations, performance reviews, and hierarchical management that typically consume significant time and create interpersonal conflict.
- Fixed compensation eliminates debates about bonus deservingness and target achievement while trusting employees to perform optimally without financial incentives
- Internal titles remain simply "software engineer" and "lead" regardless of experience level, with external title flexibility for resume and LinkedIn purposes
- Few promotion levels with substantial differences prevent micro-management of incremental performance improvements and focus on meaningful capability growth
- The principle applies to technical architecture decisions, preferring simple solutions over complex engineering unless complexity provides clear measurable benefits
Radical simplicity enables focus on core business value creation rather than organizational maintenance, contributing to exceptional operational efficiency.
Engineering Excellence Through Constraint
- Engineering culture deliberately avoids on-call systems for most products, forcing developers to build robust systems from initial development rather than relying on operational safety nets
- The constraint breeds careful consideration of corner cases and system reliability during development phase when fixes cost less than production incidents
- "Safety net" availability changes engineering mindset from comprehensive design thinking to "fix it later" approaches that accumulate technical debt
- On-call systems reserved only for products where failure would cause "truly staggering" damage or during infrastructure transition periods
The no-on-call philosophy reflects deeper principle about building quality into systems rather than managing quality problems after deployment. This approach requires higher initial engineering investment but reduces long-term operational costs.
Developer experience improvements become essential when operational support doesn't exist, creating positive feedback loops for system reliability and developer productivity.
- Platform teams provide shared infrastructure services including authentication, analytics, monetization, and machine learning capabilities across all 100+ products
- Standardized data formats and semantic structures enable tool reuse across different business units, amplifying platform development investment returns
- Continuous integration/continuous deployment improvements become critical for rapid iteration without operational support, leading to multiple daily deployments
- Technical stack flexibility allows teams to choose optimal tools while encouraging standardization for knowledge sharing and operational efficiency
The engineering approach prioritizes long-term system quality over short-term development speed, creating sustainable competitive advantages through superior reliability.
The Great Evernote Rewrite: From Legacy to Modern Architecture
- Evernote's inherited architecture consisted of 750 manually-provisioned virtual machines running Java 11 monolith with uneven data sharding causing operational nightmares
- Migration from on-premises to cloud occurred through basic "lift and shift" approach without architectural modernization, creating worst-of-both-worlds scenario
- Complete rewrite moved user data from local VM storage to managed database infrastructure, enabling application layer flexibility and eliminating manual server management
- Transformation from polling-based client synchronization to event-driven communication reduced data synchronization issues and improved real-time collaboration
The technical transformation required simultaneously maintaining service for existing users while completely rebuilding underlying architecture—a classic strangler fig pattern executed at massive scale.
Performance improvements reached 10-12x faster synchronization speeds while eliminating data corruption issues that plagued previous architecture through better backend state management.
- Microservices migration tackled core note functionality after peripheral services, requiring careful coordination to avoid disrupting primary user workflows
- Event-driven architecture eliminated client-side conflict resolution complexity by centralizing state management and pushing consistent updates to all connected clients
- CI/CD pipeline modernization moved from self-hosted Jenkins to CircleCI with custom orbs, enabling rapid deployment cycles and reducing manual release processes
- Monolith elimination scheduled for end of 2024 represents symbolic victory for engineering team and enables final architecture consolidation phase
The rewrite demonstrates how patient capital and technical excellence can resurrect struggling products through fundamental infrastructure improvements rather than surface-level feature additions.
Hiring for Talent Over Experience
- Hiring strategy deliberately favors new graduates and inexperienced candidates over senior engineers, optimizing for raw talent rather than accumulated experience
- Talent represents unteachable characteristic while experience can be provided through high-quality mentorship, challenging projects, and collaborative environment
- Experienced engineers often struggle adapting to unusual culture and processes, while inexperienced hires embrace novel approaches without preconceived expectations
- Long-term orientation justifies investment in training and development with multi-year view rather than immediate productivity expectations
The talent-first approach requires significant organizational investment in mentorship and development but creates stronger cultural alignment and retention.
New graduate hiring provides access to cutting-edge academic knowledge while avoiding industry baggage about "how things should be done" that can limit innovation.
- Interview process focuses on problem-solving ability, learning speed, ownership mentality, and collaborative attitude rather than specific technical experience
- Team spirit and collaborative attitude represent non-negotiable requirements, leading to rejection of brilliant individuals who disrupt team dynamics
- Career development emphasizes "360-degree engineer" growth including product impact understanding rather than narrow technical specialization
- Training investment includes platform knowledge, company culture, and business understanding rather than just technical skills development
The approach creates high-performing teams through cultural fit and talent density rather than individual expertise accumulation.
Platform-First Architecture at Scale
- Shared platform supports 100+ digital products with 200M+ monthly active users through common services including authentication, analytics, monetization, and machine learning
- Platform architecture handles 100,000+ requests per second across all business units while maintaining performance and reliability standards
- AI infrastructure manages 2,000+ average daily inferences with 8,000+ peak capacity requiring dynamic GPU allocation algorithms for cost optimization
- Business unit autonomy operates within platform framework, enabling rapid product development while leveraging shared technical capabilities
The platform approach creates economies of scale impossible for individual product teams while maintaining flexibility for business-specific requirements.
Technical standardization enables tool and knowledge sharing across teams while preventing technology fragmentation that would increase operational complexity.
- Machine learning models for user behavior prediction and value forecasting serve multiple products through standardized APIs
- A/B testing infrastructure enables experimentation across all products with consistent methodology and results analysis
- Marketing automation spends tens of millions annually through algorithmic optimization rather than manual campaign management
- Data warehouse standardization enables cross-product analytics and business intelligence through consistent semantic structures
Platform investment creates competitive moats through technical capabilities that individual products couldn't justify building independently.
Self-Funded Growth in Venture Capital World
- Italian startup ecosystem in 2013-2014 made venture capital access "borderline impossible" forcing creative financing through traditional bank loans
- Self-funding discipline created operational efficiency mindset and resource optimization focus that became competitive advantage over venture-funded competitors
- Profitable operations every year since founding enabled reinvestment in acquisitions totaling over $1 billion while maintaining financial independence
- Resource scarcity bred "resourcefulness and ingenuity" that provides advantages over companies "flooded with financing" and less operational discipline
The financing constraint forced fundamental efficiency thinking that venture-backed companies often skip during growth phases, creating sustainable business practices.
Bank loan financing required demonstrable business model viability and cash flow generation rather than growth projections and market opportunity presentations.
- Acquisition funding comes from company profits rather than external capital, aligning acquisition decisions with long-term business performance
- Management ownership concentration creates founder-like incentives across leadership team rather than hired management optimizing for different metrics
- Financial independence enables contrarian decisions and long-term thinking without external investor pressure for specific growth metrics or exit timelines
- Operational efficiency becomes competitive advantage when competing against venture-funded companies that can afford inefficient practices
Self-funding creates business model sustainability and operational excellence that becomes difficult for competitors to match through capital alone.
Building Products That Users Actually Want
- Product development prioritizes user-requested features that balance importance with development difficulty, creating efficient value delivery through strategic prioritization
- Feature development mixes quick wins like collapsible note sections with longer infrastructure projects like backend rewrites to maintain visible progress
- Customer feedback drives product roadmap decisions rather than internal feature preferences or competitive pressure responses
- Shipping 100+ improvements annually demonstrates rapid iteration capability while maintaining product quality and user satisfaction
The product approach emphasizes user value delivery over technological sophistication, ensuring engineering effort translates to measurable user benefit.
Balance between visible features and infrastructure improvements prevents user experience stagnation while building sustainable technical foundations.
- AI transcription feature represents cutting-edge capability development that showcases technical excellence while solving real user problems
- Feature prioritization considers both user impact and engineering complexity to maximize value delivery per development hour invested
- External tooling like standalone transcription demonstrates confidence in technical capabilities while expanding market reach beyond core product users
- Performance improvements like 10-12x synchronization speed create user value without requiring user behavior changes or learning curves
Product success comes from solving real problems efficiently rather than building impressive technology that doesn't address user needs.
Common Questions
Q: How does Bending Spoons justify their controversial acquisition approach?
A: They view it as building sustainable businesses that can thrive for decades rather than allowing slow decline and eventual failure.
Q: What is "radical simplicity" and how does it work in practice?
A: Complexity addition requires proof of benefit while simplicity needs no justification, eliminating bonuses, titles, and complex processes.
Q: Why do they hire mostly junior engineers instead of experienced ones?
A: They optimize for talent over experience since talent can't be taught but experience can be provided through mentorship and challenging projects.
Q: How did they completely rewrite Evernote's architecture?
A: Moved from 750 manual VMs with Java monolith to microservices with managed databases and event-driven architecture over 18+ months.
Q: What makes their engineering culture different from typical tech companies?
A: No on-call systems force robust system design, platform-first architecture, and radical simplicity in all technical and organizational decisions.
Bending Spoons demonstrates how unconventional approaches can create extraordinary results when consistently applied with long-term thinking. Their success comes from rejecting Silicon Valley orthodoxy in favor of sustainable business practices, technical excellence, and cultural alignment. The combination of controversial acquisition strategy, radical simplicity principles, and engineering excellence creates a unique competitive position that generates massive value while maintaining profitability and employee satisfaction. Their model proves that alternative approaches to building technology companies can succeed when executed with discipline and conviction.